Article

4

min read

Access to Work for Persons with Disabilities: Is It Still Limited?

Writer

Fildza

Published on

“The government and local governments are obligated to ensure a recruitment process, acceptance, job training, job placement, job sustainability, and career development that is fair and non-discriminatory towards persons with disabilities.” 

 

This is the content of Article 45 Law No. 8 of 2016 regarding persons with disabilities. Through this law, the government guarantees that persons with disabilities can obtain their rights, including the right to work without discrimination. Disability discrimination, or what can also be called discrimination against disabled persons, occurs when there is differentiation, exclusion, limitation, harassment, or ostracism based on the physical, intellectual, and/or sensory limitations that a person has. 

Now the question is whether the government has indeed succeeded in implementing a workplace free from disability discrimination? Or is access to work for persons with disabilities still limited?

 

Employment absorption of persons with disabilities is still low

According to data from BPS in 2018, only 0.31% of workers are persons with disabilities. This figure even dropped in 2019 to 0.28%. According to Article 53 of Law No. 8 of 2016, it is stated that government offices, local governments, SOEs, and regional companies are required to employ at least 2% of persons with disabilities. Meanwhile, private offices are required to employ at least 1% of persons with disabilities. Therefore, there should be at least 3% of Indonesian workers with disabilities classified as labor/employees/staff. 

Returning to the data from BPS in 2018 and 2019, here are the details of the employment status distribution of persons with disabilities in Indonesia:

From the table, it can be seen that more than 50% of workers with disabilities have their own businesses. Only 20% are labor/employees/staff. Then 15% are family workers/unpaid, and the remaining 10% are freelancers. This shows that there are still very few persons with disabilities working in the formal sector.

 

Stories of discrimination against persons with disabilities when applying for work

One concrete example of the difficulty for persons with disabilities to obtain employment occurred in 2019, when a dentist named Romi Syofpa Ismael (Romi) was denied the opportunity to become a civil servant (PNS) by the Regent of South Solok due to his disability. 

Another case involved Takwani Suci Prestanti (Suci), a female graduate who completed her formal education in 2016 but only found employment in 2019. 

“Graduated in 2016 and only worked in 2019. Almost three years (without work). I applied to almost 50 jobs and got no results. Maybe I reached one, two, three stages and there was still no certainty. It was very difficult,” Suci stated.

The stories of Dr. Romi and Suci are just a few examples of the discrimination faced by disabled individuals in the workforce. There are still many stories of disability discrimination that have not been published. 

Until now, the government still does not have accurate data on how many offices/companies comply with this law. If there is no data, how can we expect the government to impose sanctions on offices/companies that violate this law, right?

 

Support for building an inclusive workplace for persons with disabilities

Although the participation rate of persons with disabilities in the workforce is still low, it does not mean that there is no hope for them to work. Many social initiatives have been launched by society to create an inclusive working environment for persons with disabilities. One of them is https://kerjabilitas.com/, a career social network that connects persons with disabilities with inclusive job providers in Indonesia. 

Additionally, for agencies or companies that want to start employing persons with disabilities, the ILO provides a guideline on Managing Persons with Disabilities in the Workplace according to ILO Convention No. 159 of 1983. This guideline aims to help agencies or companies increase job opportunities for persons with disabilities; ensure a workplace that is safe, accessible, and healthy; minimize the costs for employers who hire persons with disabilities; and maximize the contributions that disabled workers can provide to the company.

 

Written by Fildza

Source:

  1. Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities

  2. Wage Indicator in Indonesia 2019 – BPS

  3. Disability Doctor Denial, Commitment to Erase Discrimination in Work – Tirto.id

  4. The Story of Persons with Disabilities Seeking Work: ‘Almost 50 Times Applied but Got No Results’ – BBC News

  5. ILO Guidelines: Managing Persons with Disabilities in the Workplace

Other articles

Article

2

min read

Banyak Sojin di Sekitar Kita: Tentang Sistem yang Belum Siap Melindungi Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Tempat Kerja

Cho Nam Joo menjadikan esainya dalam bentuk buku berjudul Her Name Is… Berisi banyak cerita dari berbagai perempuan. Cerita-cerita mereka banyak mengangkat isu ketidaksetaraan gender yang cukup kental dalam kultur Korea Selatan.

Salah satu cerita yang cukup membuat “gelisah” adalah kisah milik Sojin. Seorang pegawai perempuan yang masih muda dan mengalami pelecehan seksual oleh atasannya (Kepala Divisi).

Sojin yang Melawan

Sojin yang resah tidak tinggal diam. Ia memutuskan untuk melaporkan kasusnya. Mulai dengan melapor pada manajer tim. Namun solusi yang ditawarkan adalah dengan memindahkan Sojin. 

Buku Cho Nam Joo - Her Name Is…

Menurut Sojin tidak seharusnya korban yang “melarikan diri” harusnya pelaku yang dipindahkan atau bahkan dikeluarkan. Sojin lalu mengirim keluhan dan laporan resmi ke divisi SDM.

Sayangnya, alih-alih dibantu, Sojin justru disudutkan dan disalahkan dalam proses tersebut. Bahkan ia dipersulit oleh pelaku yang adalah atasannya, dan dikucilkan di kantor.

Sojin meneruskan perjuangannya sampai ke Kementerian Tenaga Kerja, bahkan sudah mendapat surat tembusan agar perusahaan menghukum pelaku. Tapi tidak dilakukan oleh perusahaan.

Mengapa Korban Enggan Melapor

Hasil riset Never Okay Project di tahun 2022 memiliki beberapa temuan kunci. Salah satunya menyebutkan bahwa hanya 10,94% korban yang berani melapor ke Manajemen atau divisi SDM kantor.

Sementara sebanyak 42,55% memilih untuk diam saja dan tidak melapor kejadian kekerasan dan pelecehan seksual yang mereka alami di lingkungan kerja.

Salah satu alasan mengapa mereka enggan melapor adalah karena para korban (45,61%) merasa bahwa pihak Manajemen tidak akan melakukan apapun.

Angka-angka ini adalah alarm keras. Ketika mayoritas korban merasa lebih aman untuk diam daripada melapor, itu tandanya ada yang salah dengan sistem pendukung di tempat kerja tersebut.

Bukan tanpa alasan korban enggan bersuara. Sering kali, saat laporan dibuat, mekanisme internal perusahaan justru berfokus pada "menjaga reputasi" daripada "mencari keadilan". 

Korban kerap menghadapi investigasi yang intimidatif, pertanyaan yang menyalahkan korban (victim blaming), hingga ancaman kehilangan pekerjaan. Akibatnya, pelaku sering kali tetap melenggang tanpa hukuman yang setimpal.

Read more

Article

2

min read

Jadi Saksi yang Berani Beraksi Seperti Jung Da-Jung di Drakor 18 Again

Pernahkah kamu berada di situasi di mana kamu melihat langsung ketika rekan kerja diperlakukan tidak pantas? Situasi yang sering membuat kamu bingung, tidak tahu harus berbuat apa? Kamu tidak sendirian.

Berdasarkan Survei Kekerasan dan Pelecehan di Dunia Kerja Indonesia 2022 yang dirilis oleh Never Okay Project, faktanya sebanyak 72,77% orang pernah menjadi saksi kekerasan dan pelecehan di lingkungan kerja.

Mengapa Saksi Sering Memilih Diam?

Meskipun angka saksi ini sangat tinggi, kenyataannya ada banyak juga saksi yang memilih diam. Mengapa demikian?

Menjadi saksi atau bystander memiliki beban mental tersendiri. Beberapa alasan utama mengapa saksi enggan melapor atau bertindak antara lain:

  • Takut kariernya akan terhambat atau dikucilkan oleh lingkungan kantor.

  • Merasa manajemen tidak akan mengambil tindakan tegas meski sudah melapor.

  • Takut dianggap terlalu ikut campur.

Keberanian Itu Bukan Fiksi

Tim Never Okay Project menemukan salah satu scene menarik dalam drakor 18 Again (2020). Scene ketika Jung Da-Jung (Kim Ha-Neul) melihat senior kantornya diam-diam merekam rok rekannya sesama karyawan magang. Kejadian yang berlangsung di dalam lift itu mengejutkan Da-Jung.

Tanpa berpikir panjang, ia langsung memelintir tangan pelaku dan memaksanya keluar dari lift. Da-Jung juga mengkonfrontasi pelaku untuk membuka ponselnya untuk diperiksa. Setelah bukti-bukti dipastikan, pelaku tersebut kemudian digiring keluar oleh polisi untuk diamankan.

Apakah aksi berani seperti ini fiksi dan hanya bisa dilakukan di dalam adegan-adegan film? Tentu, tidak. 

Menjadi Saksi yang Berani Beraksi

Kamu juga bisa menjadi saksi yang berani beraksi. Tapi, sebelum itu, ada hal yang lebih penting untuk diutamakan, yakni keamanan dan keselamatan diri.

Merespons kekerasan dan pelecehan seksual di depan mata tidak selalu harus menggunakan cara yang Da-Jung lakukan. Berikut adalah beberapa hal yang dapat kamu lakukan.

Jika kamu rasa situasinya aman, kamu bisa mengkonfrontasi dan mengedukasi pelaku.

Jika kamu rasa situasinya tidak aman, ini yang bisa kamu lakukan:

Saat kejadian:

  • Alihkan perhatian atau topik pembicaraan.

  • Minta rekan kerja senior untuk menegur pelaku.

  • Dokumentasikan kejadian tersebut.


    Setelah kejadian:

  • Tenangkan dan tanyakan keadaan korban.

  • Tawarkan bantuan pada korban.

  • Jadi saksi pada pelaporan ke atasan atau HR.

  • Gunakan hasil dokumentasi untuk bukti pelaporan.

  • Pantau perkembangan laporan.

Cerita Jung Da-Jung dalam drama mungkin fiksi, namun tantangan yang dihadapi para pekerja di Indonesia adalah nyata. Menciptakan ruang kerja yang aman bukan hanya tugas manajemen, tapi juga tanggung jawab kita sebagai saksi yang berani beraksi.

It’s Not A Fiction. Jangan biarkan lingkungan kerja kita menjadi tempat yang tidak aman bagi siapapun.

Read more

Article

4

min read

Just Pretend to Be Good: About the Well-being of Lecturers in Indonesia

Lecturers so far seem to have no problems, maybe it’s because we are in denial. We pretend to be okay. So it’s like (we need) awareness that we are not okay, awareness that something needs to change, awareness that we are the working class who are very likely to be oppressed in our work fulfillment relationships.” – Nabiyla Risfa Azzati, representative of the Lecturer Welfare Research Team (2023)


The teaching profession, which is considered promising, does not guarantee worker welfare. A survey from the Lecturer Welfare Team shows that there are still lecturers who are dissatisfied with their salaries. This research was released in commemoration of Labor Day and National Education Day 2023. 

Survey by the Lecturer Welfare Research Team (UGM-UI-Unram, 2023) shows that 42.9% of lecturers earn below Rp3 million. About 35% of them feel that their monthly income does not match their workload and qualifications as lecturers. Moreover, nearly one-third of respondents reported spending monthly living costs of Rp3-5 million.

 

Not All Lecturers Live Prosperously

The representative of the Lecturer Welfare Research Team, Nabiyla Risfa Azzati, stated that this research shows the fact that many lecturers are not prosperous. The labor law lecturer at UGM noted that more than 40% of lecturers earning below Rp3 million is a red flag

“This speaks about a profession that on one hand requires very high qualifications to enter, therefore its barrier is very high, while on the other hand, this profession also becomes the backbone of knowledge creation,” emphasized Nabiyla when met by the Never Okay Project (NOP) team. 

 

Issues of Lecturer Welfare Rarely Discussed 

Nabiyla revealed that the welfare of lecturers is rarely raised. This is why this research was conducted: to make this issue mainstream so that the parties concerned can be more open and acknowledge that there are problems. 

“Because if we can acknowledge that there is a problem, we can start from there, we can look for solutions together. If we don’t even admit there’s a problem, it’s very difficult, right?” she said. 

Nabiyla realizes that discussions about salaries are still considered taboo, especially for the teaching profession, which is considered noble and carries a certain social status. She also acknowledges that it is not difficult to find prosperous lecturers. However, that does not mean we should turn a blind eye to the 42.9% of respondents who earn less than Rp3 million. 

“If my life is used as an example, lecturers are fine. But there are many other lecturers who are not okay,” she said. 

 

Lecturers No Longer an Attractive Career Choice

The results of this research also seem to answer an assumption that being a lecturer is no longer an attractive choice. “How can we attract quality individuals to work in a profession that in its early stages cannot provide welfare. Like it’s impossible,” she said. 

Nabiyla also mentioned the high resignation rate from CASN (Civil Service Candidates) lecturers. This indicates that something is wrong. 

“This actually shows that there’s something wrong, we do not value people who actually want to dedicate their time to knowledge creation in Indonesia,” she explained. 

 

Read also: Violence Against Journalists: From Sexual to KBGO

 

Ideal Salary Standards for Lecturers

Discussing ideal salaries for lecturers is quite complicated. This is because the benchmark for fair wages in Indonesia refers to the minimum wage, which in this context is the standard of Decent Living Needs (KHL). However, this context is considered less suitable when talking about lecturer salaries. 

“Why? Because first, the barrier to becoming a lecturer is high, so this should be seen as a profession that should not be valued at bare minimum,” explained Nabiyla. 

She compared it to other countries that generally do not value lecturer salaries at minimum wage. The reason is that lecturer salaries there are negotiated. In Indonesia, sector-based negotiations are nearly non-existent, so the Lecturer Welfare Research Team cannot answer how to provide an ideal standard for lecturers. 

 

Comparing Lecturer Salaries with Neighboring Countries

The Lecturer Welfare Research Team attempted to compare lecturer salaries in Indonesia with comparable neighboring countries, namely Malaysia and Thailand. The results are quite shocking. The average lecturer salary in Malaysia is Rp 20-25 million and in Thailand is Rp 38-42 million. Nabiyla revealed that initially, the team felt those figures were not suitable for this job because they were too high. However, the main problem is that Indonesia does not have a standard for lecturer salaries. 

“The comparison with Malaysia and Thailand should not be a very far comparison, but seeing that we currently do not have a standard, if we were to present at the Ministry of Education and Culture, we’d face ridicule. It’s strange how we don’t have standards; we are even afraid to mention a figure that isn’t too high at all, it’s actually quite normal,” said Nabiyla. 

 

Lecturers are Workers Too: Fighting Not to be Oppressed

The survey results from the Lecturer Welfare Research Team also show that the lecturer profession is a labor profession. Therefore, it is necessary to fight to not be oppressed. 

“Call us professional workers, call us white-collar workers, call us knowledge producers, whatever the name, at the end of the day, we are workers, we are laborers,” said Nabiyla. 

 

Source:

  • Lecturer Welfare Research Team. (2023, May 4). How much do lecturers earn? Here are the results of the first national survey mapping the welfare of academics in Indonesia. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/berapa-gaji-dosen-berikut-hasil-survei-nasional-pertama-yang-memetakan-kesejahteraan-akademisi-di-indonesia-203854 accessed on May 21, 2023.  

  • Interview with the representative of the Lecturer Welfare Research Team, Nabiyla Risfa Azzati. May 17, 2023. 

 

Writer: Yanti Nainggolan

Editor: Imelda

Read more

MUST READ

Results of the 2022 survey

Report: Survey on Violence and Harassment in the World of Work in Indonesia 2022 by Never Okay Project & International Labour Organization Indonesia

MUST READ

Results of the 2022 survey

Report: Survey on Violence and Harassment in the World of Work in Indonesia 2022 by Never Okay Project & International Labour Organization Indonesia

MUST READ

Results of the 2022 survey

Report: Survey on Violence and Harassment in the World of Work in Indonesia 2022 by Never Okay Project & International Labour Organization Indonesia

MUST READ

Results of the 2022 survey

Report: Survey on Violence and Harassment in the World of Work in Indonesia 2022 by Never Okay Project & International Labour Organization Indonesia

© 2026 Never Okay Project. All rights reserved. Made by adila

© 2026 Never Okay Project. All rights reserved. Made by adila

© 2024 Never Okay Project.

All rights reserved. Made by adila